Monthly Archives: September 2007

Clearing Bad Press From The Search Engine Results

I was recently approached by a company asking the question: Can search engine optimization get rid of bad press in the search engine results? The answer is both yes, and no.

While you can’t wipe out the pages themselves from the search engine results (some scoundrels claim they can, but that’s another story), you can help your public relations online by getting rid of those results in a roundabout way. You don’t really need them to disappear, you just need them to sink a few pages back where no one will find it. So how do you do that? Good press. Lots of it that ranks well.

Generally where bad press will really affect you is not the keywords for which you are competing in your niche, but for your name itself. As you cannot have more than a few results on the same page for your site, you must then have high ranking content on other sites for your name.

There are two options available to you, and I suggest making use of both of them to increase the likelihood that the bad press will no longer appear in the first few pages.

  1. Create content on another site that uses your company name in the title tag. Press releases are a good example of how businesses might go about this.
  2. Create content on your site and submit it to sites that generally rank high in the search engines, such as Digg. Use your company name in the title tag.

It’s that easy… you can even link to these pages so that they achieve higher results as well.  You can also build links, but this must occur in a specific type of directory that gives each site it’s own page generally with the name of your site in the title tag.

And if you really want to spend money, why not get some reviews on blogs with the stipulation that they use your company name in the title of their post.

And that’s what I told them.

Popularity: 1% [?]

FaceBookCamp Toronto 2

FaceBook Camp

On October 9, I plan on attending FaceBookCampToronto2, an “unconference” that is part of FaceBook Developer Garage, and it brings together developers and marketers to discuss the creation and promotion of FaceBook apps. The first FaceBookCamp that occurred on August 8 was geared more to the development crowd, but the agenda for the October 9 FaceBookCamp seems geared more to the marketers among us.

I am still making my mind up whether I want to live-blog the event, or if I want to cover it in a series over the week following. But I will be be covering the events of FaceBookCamp Toronto on October 9 in any case for those who are unable to attend.

For those interested and who will be in the Toronto area on October 9, you can confirm your attendance to FaceBookCampToronto2 here: BarCamp wiki

Popularity: 1% [?]

The Specialization of Social Bookmarking / Social Networking

The social phenomena of specialization is not a new – every human pursuit has a tendency to specialization it seems. It makes sense, really. Specialization allows for greater productivity, which is mutually beneficial for all those involved. It seems that social bookmarking and social networking sites are not to be left out in this tendency towards specialization.

Social bookmarking and social networking allow the user to interact with other users, and for the user to also contribute to the site. Over the past several years, generalized websites for these purposes have achieved great success. Now, specialized sites are popping up to “increase the productivity” of users. For example, the recent unveiling of Sphinn, the social bookmarking site for internet marketers, has been very well-received by the online community. And today, I learn that there is now a social networking site for people who like hip-hop. StreetCred is being endorsed by some big names in music, and even in beta has garnered some attention. There are many examples I could site, but these are some better examples of social networking / bookmarking that truly endeavor to fill a niche market.

Benefits of the specialization of Web 2.0

  • Users will not have to sift through as much information they do not want
  • Those submitting the information will reach the people who are looking for it much quicker
  • Tighter social community based on shared interests and abilities
  • The principle of comparative advantage would dictate that in fact users of the various social sites would indeed benefit from information being “produced” in “different places” by those who were especially in a position to produce it
  • From a marketing perspective – the more places to market the better

Drawbacks of the Specialization of Web 2.0

  • Encourages a myopic view by reducing the diversity of information the user sees

Some suggestions for good social bookmarking and social networking sites:

  • Social bookmarking site with news about social bookmarking
  • Social networking site for cowboys :)
  • Social networking where you can list dance parties
  • Social bookmarking site for spammers – maybe if we give them their own site, they won’t bother with the others… ?

Popularity: 1% [?]

Google Introduces Gadget Ads: Rich Media Ad Format

Google has unveiled a new interactive ad format, Gadget Ads.

Gadget ads – non-traditional ad units with interactive, rich media capabilities – not only enable advertisers to target audiences in a flexible and timely manner via regular updates within the ad unit, but also allow users to engage with ad content in a way static ads haven’t facilitated in the past.

These ads claim are meant to transcend rich media, and Google calls them “websites within websites”, and these will be used in the traditional method of advertising on AdSense publishers. Also, the “gadgets” will be available in the iGoogle gadgets directory. These will incorporate “data feeds, maps, images, audio, video, Flash, HTML or JavaScript in a single creative”.

I am surprised it took this long for Google to introduce a rich media ad format alternative, but I am sure that this new alternative will attract a lot (and bigger) business for Google AdWords. Aimed at larger corporations and no doubt at shorter term campaigns, in beta testing the results are apparently very positive.

For more information about Google Gadget Ads, here is the new home of Gadget Ads

In related news: Google has also introduced Google mobile ads. Pssht.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Oink.CD & The Marketing Genius of By Invitation Only

I recently wrote about my friend’s quest to get an Oink invitation. Well, her search got her an invite, and she managed to get one for me as well. Once I joined, I was surprised at the VERY strict rules and to be honest, I was nervous to do anything for about 4 weeks.

It’s crazy how many people want an invite to Oink… some people wait for years on waiting lists and apparently people pay for Oink invites (which is not allowed). With the number of great torrent sharing sites, why does everyone want an Oink invite? I was reminded of Seth Godin‘s Unleashing the Ideavirus:

Several years ago, a hot chef in Chicago decided to go out on his own and open his first restaurant. Realizing how competitive the market was, he did a neat thing. He never opened it to the public. He refused to accept reservations from strangers.

If you wanted to get into Les Nomades, you had to be a member. And how did you do that? Well, the first 500 people were given memberships because the chef knew them as regular customers at his old job, and he personally invited them. Then he told each member that they were welcome to sponsor other members. All they had to do was vouch for someone and he’d make them a member too.

So, what’s in it for the member to nominate someone else? Simple. They scored points with their friends as powerful sneezers because they could “get you in” to the hottest restaurant in town.

Of course, this wouldn’t have worked if the restaurant hadn’t been spectacular. But it was. And it was exclusive. But by allowing his members to do his marketing for him, by giving them an altruistic tool that increased their power as professional sneezers, the chef was able to get out of the way and let his customers sell for him.

And Oink and Demonoid, and other “coveted” torrent sharing site, require an invitation from a member. I like Oink for the obvious reasons (the colour scheme). Both, however, are very fast, but do require you to maintain a sharing ratio. So now, with my membership there, I am to sell my friends on these sites… and invite them to join? ;)

It really is a great idea though, making your site exclusive to ensure that your site will be absolutely popular. There are about 180,000 members on Oink, and generally half of them log in daily. This would not work with every type of website of course. Any site, however, where the market is already flooded, could make it very exclusive and require invitation only.

Popularity: 1% [?]